Processo decisorio pdf

Aspectos institucionais. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Editora, Desafios aos deuses: a fascinante historia do risco. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.

Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. O Empreendedor: fundamentos da iniciativa empresarial. Uma escala para identificar potencial empreendedor. Tese de Doutorado. DISE G. Nicita and U. Pagano eds. Francisco G. Miriam L.

Moreira Leite. Entrepreneurship: a diverse concept in a diverse world. Anais: IberoAcademy: Academyof Management. Faculdade de Economia - Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Lisbon, Portugal - December, , Porto Alegre. O Mito do Empreendedor. Acesso em: 16 insumos ao desenvolvimento industrial. Esse modelo, baseado numa es- ago. Quer saber mais sobre o DASP? Acesso em: 24 ago. Falta de 9. Perde o 3. Incha ainda mais 6. As empresas por sua vez necessitam promover Unidade! Morgan , p. Gosta de aprender com as 6 Unidade adversidades e faz disso um aprendizado.

Thompson et al. Assim, pode-se, conceitualmente, pensar nesses sistemas sem v necessariamente ter um suporte computacional. Acesso em : 24 ago. Fonte: Campos Filho A velocidade com que a TI evolui tem reflexos na sociedade que a utiliza.

Albertin , p. Com efeito, tem ocorrido no mundo um grande desenvolvimento de hardware e software. Rio de Janeiro: Excel Books do Brasil, The new product development process: part 2. Improving the process of new product development. Paris: Seuil, In: Decidir, outubro de , pp. Acesso em: 3 set. Acesso em: 31 out. Acesso em: 30 out.

Construindo uma equipe de sucesso. Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Total quality development: a step-by-step guide to world class concurrent engineering.

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, Trabalhar sem partitura. Governo de Castello. Porto Alegre: Ortiz, Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63— Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90 4 , — Does fairness prevent market clearing?

An experimental investigation. Fernbach, P. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2 , Fiedler, K. Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 4 , — Fischer, P. Self-regulation and selective exposure: The impact of depleted self-regulation resources on confirmatory information processing.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 3 , Fischhoff, B. Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Cognitive liabilities and product liability. Journal of. Fisher, R. Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Flyvbjerg, B. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Foot, P. Forgas, J.

Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model AIM. Psychological Bulletin, 1 , 39— Forsyth, D. Attributional egocentrism following a performance of a competitive task.

Journal of Social Psychology, , — Fox, C. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44 7 , — Fredrickson, J. Strategic Management Journal, 31 10 , — Friedman, A. High-altitude decision making. Artigo apresentado na Jeffrey Z. Rubin Memorial Conference, Cambridge, Mass. Friedman, D. American Economic Review, 88 4 , — Fujita, K. Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 6 , — Galinsky, A. First offers as anchors: The role of perspectivetaking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 4 , — Gentner, D.

Learning and. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 2 , — Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, — Gigerenzer, G. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence.

Psychological Review, 98 4 , — Gilbert, D. How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46 2 , — Inferential correction. Gilovich, D. Griffin e D. Kahneman Eds. Cambridge, U. Stumbling on happiness. Nova York: Random House. The correspondence bias.

Psychological Bulletin, 1 , 21— Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. Forgas Ed. Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 3 , — Gilovich, T. Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 4 , — Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 2 , — The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, — Gino, F. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, — Bazerman Ed. Messick p. Gladwell, M. The formula: What if you built a machine to predict hit movies? Cocksure: Banks, battles, and the psychology of overconfidence. Glassman, J. Dow 36, The new strategy for profiting from the coming rise in the stock market.

Nova York: Times Business. Gneezy, A. Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science, , Goetzmann, W. Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Research, 20 2 , — Goodwin, P. Decision analysis for management judgment 2a. Gore, A. Earth in the Balance. Grabiner, D. Gramzow, R. Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The Self as an evaluative base.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, — Greene, J. The moral brain and how to use it. Nova York: Penguin. Greenwald, A. The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.

American Psychologist, 35 7 , — Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 6 , — Griffin, D. Towards a consensus on overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65 3 , — Grosskopf, B. Theory and Decision, 63 4 , — Grossman, S. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70 3 , — Gruenfeld, D. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67 1 , 1— An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, — Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Moral dumbfounding. Hammond, J. Smart choices: A practical guide to making better life decisions.

Nova York: Broadway. Haran, U. A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 7 , — Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. FDA warns device maker over safety. Hastorf, A. They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, — Hawken, P.

The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability 1st ed. Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. Henrich, J. Em search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 73— Henrion, M. Assessing uncertainty in physical constants. American Journal of Physics, 54 9 , — Hershey, J.

Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, — Herzog, S. The wisdom of many in one mind. Psychological Science, , — Highhouse, S. Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1 3 , — Ho, T. Hoch, S. Who do we know: Predicting the interests and opinions of the American consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 3 , — Hoffman, E.

On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. International Journal of Game Theory, 25, — Holt, J. The new, soft paternalism. Holt, L. Speech perception within an auditory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 1 , 42— Horberg, E. Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 6 , — Hsee, C.

The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67 3 , — Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, — Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis.

Psychological Bulletin, 5 , — Idson, L. Overcoming focusing failures in competitive environments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17 3 , — Iyengar, S. The art of choosing: Hachette. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 6 , — How much choice is too much: Determinants of individual contributions in K retirement plans.

Mitchell e S. Utkus Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. James, W. The principles of psychology. Nova York: H. Janiszewski, C. Precision of the anchor influences the amount of adjustment. Psychological Science, 19 2 , Judgments about judgments: The dissociation of consideration price and transaction commitment judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,. Janofsky, M. Scalia refusing to take himself off Cheney case.

Jefferis, V. Accessibility as input: The use of construct accessibility as information to guide behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 4 , — Jegadeesh, N. Journal of Finance, 48 1 , 65— Johnson, D. Overconfidence and war: The havoc and glory of positive illusions. Johnson, E. Do defaults save lives? Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20— Jordan, D. The profitability of day traders. Financial Analysts Journal, 59 6 , 85— Joyce, E. Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inference in auditing.

Journal of Accounting Research, 19, — Kagel, J. American Economic Review, 76, — Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.

American Psychologist, 58 9 , — Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64 6 , — Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17— Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93 2 , — Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 5— Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness.

Cognitive Psychology, 3 3 , — On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, — Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 2 , — The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 1 , — The simulation heuristic. Nova York: Cambridge University Press. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements and the market. American Economic Review, 76 4 , — Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem.

Journal of Political Economy, 98 6 , — Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 49— KEEN, P. Reading, Addison-Wesley, Inc. Management Science, vol. B, April. Decision Suport Systems, n. URIS, A. O Livro de Mesa do Executivo.